PhenomGW
The 'Epic' Dutchman
contributor
LEVEL 13
86 XP
You make a good point there. Perhaps the submission itself should be visible, but URL's in descriptions and download functionality should be disabled until approved? Rejected leaks could go in some sort of public archive with reason why.My only problem with this is bias. Who's to say the code this person is leaking isn't managements? Seems a bit two-faced to say: "Yes, leaks are allowed, BUT NOT MY LEAKS!"
Do you have any thoughts on how to tackle that problem?